<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Palm Pre Will Fail</title>
	<atom:link href="http://webos.org/2009/05/28/the-palm-pre-will-fail/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://webos.org/2009/05/28/the-palm-pre-will-fail/</link>
	<description>Unofficial Palm Community</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Dec 2011 10:25:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Palm Pre Bashing: Continued&#8230; &#124; Palm WebOS</title>
		<link>http://webos.org/2009/05/28/the-palm-pre-will-fail/comment-page-1/#comment-708</link>
		<dc:creator>Palm Pre Bashing: Continued&#8230; &#124; Palm WebOS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 18:17:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://palmwebos.org/?p=615#comment-708</guid>
		<description>[...] week we saw tech enthusiasts claiming the Palm Pre Will Fail and today, we hear from more Debbie [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] week we saw tech enthusiasts claiming the Palm Pre Will Fail and today, we hear from more Debbie [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PalmWebOS.org</title>
		<link>http://webos.org/2009/05/28/the-palm-pre-will-fail/comment-page-1/#comment-684</link>
		<dc:creator>PalmWebOS.org</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 16:00:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://palmwebos.org/?p=615#comment-684</guid>
		<description>@FreeRange - considering we also run Phandroid.com, MobileRoar.com and VerizonVoyager.org, perhaps you should rethink your assertations. 

This article isn&#039;t a feature by feature comparison and I&#039;m not suggesting WebOS will surpass the iPhone in any way/shape/form. I&#039;m simply saying it will NOT be a complete failure as stated by others.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@FreeRange &#8211; considering we also run Phandroid.com, MobileRoar.com and VerizonVoyager.org, perhaps you should rethink your assertations. </p>
<p>This article isn&#8217;t a feature by feature comparison and I&#8217;m not suggesting WebOS will surpass the iPhone in any way/shape/form. I&#8217;m simply saying it will NOT be a complete failure as stated by others.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FreeRange</title>
		<link>http://webos.org/2009/05/28/the-palm-pre-will-fail/comment-page-1/#comment-678</link>
		<dc:creator>FreeRange</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 02:26:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://palmwebos.org/?p=615#comment-678</guid>
		<description>There are no convincing arguments as to why WebOS will be that successful, or superior to the iPhone OS, especially when you wrap it around the full Apple ecosystem. Trying to do a feature by feature comparison is a joke as it does not address the full nature of an OS. This site is a sham site by Palm and as such is a misuse of the .org extension reserved for non-profits.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are no convincing arguments as to why WebOS will be that successful, or superior to the iPhone OS, especially when you wrap it around the full Apple ecosystem. Trying to do a feature by feature comparison is a joke as it does not address the full nature of an OS. This site is a sham site by Palm and as such is a misuse of the .org extension reserved for non-profits.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PalmWebOS.org</title>
		<link>http://webos.org/2009/05/28/the-palm-pre-will-fail/comment-page-1/#comment-672</link>
		<dc:creator>PalmWebOS.org</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 21:59:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://palmwebos.org/?p=615#comment-672</guid>
		<description>@Paul - it doesn&#039;t, BGR only mentions a few negative points. The TechCrunch/CrunchGear is the fail.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Paul &#8211; it doesn&#8217;t, BGR only mentions a few negative points. The TechCrunch/CrunchGear is the fail.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://webos.org/2009/05/28/the-palm-pre-will-fail/comment-page-1/#comment-670</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 21:25:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://palmwebos.org/?p=615#comment-670</guid>
		<description>Where does the BGR article say that the Pre will fail?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Where does the BGR article say that the Pre will fail?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

